Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Meeting with Santa County Superviser Neal Coonerty

At this  morning's meeting, Supervisor Coonerty offered to prepare a proclamation that October 24, 2009 be a day of International Day Climate Action  (Letter at bottom; Move to come ...) (

On this Day, I hope all the citizens of Santa Cruz County unite in support of our planet and take action to reduce the dangerously high level of CO2 level already in the atmosphere.  It is not a political issue, and not something government alone can solve.

Together, I would like to see teach-ins, religious services, community and neighborhood actions in every part of Santa Cruz County.

More info about Santa Cruz & October 24, 2009

350.org (<-- view &  add your event here)


Here is what Denver is doing
San Francisco
San Jose
City of Albuquerque:
Council of Churches - Santa Clara
Los Angeles - Beach
A walker in Oregon
Portland
Seattle (facebook)
Vermont (facebook)



Tuesday, September 29, 2009

Letter to Supervisor Coonerty of Santa Cruz County

(Next post will discuss the September 30, 2009 Meeting)

September 25, 2009

Dear Supervisor Coonerty:

I am not a political person, but the need for swift action on climate change has drawn me closer to our government.   Unfortunately, the government actions and approaches I have seen, admittedly limited observations, are significantly unequal to the challenge.   You are correct that you can't just make rules, nor can I.   Our planet does not care about such issues. 

What this meeting is about is to find ways now to meet the challenge in Santa Cruz County.  Again, nature does not negotiate.

With 72 days until Copenhagen, this is my suggestion.  I think there can actually be many positive benefits.
  1. (immediate) Full disclosure and full transparency of all data, documents, targets, deadlines, risks, open issues, etc related to energy use, transportation and eCO2 emissions in Santa Cruz county.  If you ("you" means county or local government) do not have information:  say it clearly.
  2. (immediate) Appeal to all  families, community groups, churches, non-profits, schools, grocery stores, homeless, universities, even your enemies to encourage immediate vigorous debate, ideas and action  on climate change.  Give people the power to talk on street corners; to become truly informed citizens.  Intelligently, use all the resources of our talented, diverse community to plan, innovate, educate, act; we all know this much bigger than government.  (more below)  Let every child know how to calculate the CO2 emisssions from the family car and feel the work it takes to run a house for a hour (stair master isn't enough!).
  3. (before Thanksgiving of this year) Completion, verification, full public disclosure of all Green House Gas (GHG) emissions, energy use  and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in Santa Cruz County, both for baseline year and current.  Do this as per ICLEI protocols, or the most aggressive recognized methods in the international community. 
  4. (before Thanksgiving of this year) Adoption of immediate, aggressive eCO2 reduction targets.   Borrow ideas from other communities; we need action. 10x10 (10% reduction by 12/31/10), 12x12 etc.  Seal the Deal!
  5. (October 24, 2009) Urge huge Santa Cruz rally (use buses), teach-ins, education, commitment on International Climate Action Day
  6. (Thanksgiving of this year) Deliver focused, clear, accurate materials, videos, websites, outreach programs, goals to engage every organization and family in this community.  Be ready for what comes back; and keep the focus on action.
  7. (UN: Climate Change Conference - Copenhagen)   Show the local results to prove Santa Cruz County is a world leader. 
  8. (December 1, 2010 - on)  Measure and present the results; keep our community focused and the acting; and always do what is necessary without delay.  Never adjourn with out action.   And, apologies if pedantic, never attempt to fool nature; never.


In a sentence, I am calling upon you, the supervisors and the government of Santa Cruz County to lead, to govern - not merely manage, by demonstrating urgency, openness, unity, political will and utter determination to get CO2 down now and every year following.    Find a way.   There is just no more time.


Thank you.

Sunday, September 27, 2009

Low Lying Fruit in Sacramento

Christian Science Monitor's Weekly Edition reported on a new angle to reducing energy use and CO2 emissions:   "social norms"

Just by sending monthly reports to customers comparing their energy use to the neighbors, the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) was able to reduce total residential energy use by 2%.   (Not small, that's a lot of megawatts.  The total US use of wind+solar + geothermal in 2008 added up to 1%.  And US residences account for 35% of our energy and 15% of eCO2).

This was without extra rebates, tax credits, new technologies or 'widgets' as the Monitor calls them.

The report SMUD sends shows a household's use compared to 100 neighbors with similar size homes and also the 20 most efficient neighbors.  You can get a couple of smiley faces or, um, a "below average," which seems to bring out the best in people's competitive behavior.

Other utilizes throughout the country are exploring "social norm" ideas like these as a way to influence behavior, a powerful force which has been used in weight watching, online book selling and elsewhere to influence behavior.

Some utilities are going even further by creating websites with 'facebook' like communities where you can create a profile and be a star in your neighborhood by exchanging tips and ideas.

Positive Energy analyzed SMUD bills.
Efficiency 2.0 is a software developer who is creating energy online communities.

Do we have this in Santa Cruz?
In our water bill?
How about our gasoline use?  (surely it can be done!)



Christian Science Monitor Weekly Edition (9/27/09)
Not yet online

Earlier piece in NY Times

Friday, September 25, 2009

72 Days to UN Climate Conference: Santa Cruz Library to have Exhibit

Suggestions welcome: 

In honor of UN Climate Conference in December, the Santa Cruz Public library has asked me to help organize a collection of books, posters, photographs in both the children's section and main floor. I have ideas, but open to... everyone's thoughts. 

Should it shock or just educate; how to engage and not preach?

Letter to Supervisor Coonerty of Santa Cruz County

 Sent by email.
I will meet with him on September 30 for 1/2 hour.

 9/25/2009
 
Dear Supervisor Coonerty:

I am not a political person, but the need for swift action on climate change has drawn me closer to our government.   Unfortunately, the government actions and approaches I have seen, admittedly limited observations, are significantly unequal to the challenge.   You are correct that you can't just make rules, nor can I.   Our planet does not care about such issues. 

What this meeting is about is to find ways now to meet the challenge in Santa Cruz County.  Again, nature does not negotiate.

With 72 days until Copenhagen, this is my suggestion.  I think there can actually be many positive benefits.
  1. (immediate) Full disclosure and full transparency of all data, documents, targets, deadlines, risks, open issues, etc related to energy use, transportation and eCO2 emissions in Santa Cruz county.  If you ("you" means county or local government) do not have information:  say it clearly.
  2. (immediate) Appeal to all  families, community groups, churches, non-profits, schools, grocery stores, homeless, universities, even your enemies to encourage immediate vigorous debate, ideas and action  on climate change.  Give people the power to talk on street corners; to become truly informed citizens.  Intelligently, use all the resources of our talented, diverse community to plan, innovate, educate, act; we all know this much bigger than government.  (more below)  Let every child know how to calculate the CO2 emisssions from the family car and feel the work it takes to run a house for a hour (stair master isn't enough!).
  3. (before Thanksgiving of this year) Completion, verification, full public disclosure of all Green House Gas (GHG) emissions, energy use  and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in Santa Cruz County, both for baseline year and current.  Do this as per ICLEI protocols, or the most aggressive recognized methods in the international community. 
  4. (before Thanksgiving of this year) Adoption of immediate, aggressive eCO2 reduction targets.   Borrow ideas from other communities; we need action. 10x10 (10% reduction by 12/31/10), 12x12 etc.  Seal the Deal!
  5. (October 24, 2009) Urge huge Santa Cruz rally (use buses), teach-ins, education, commitment on International Climate Action Day
  6. (Thanksgiving of this year) Deliver focused, clear, accurate materials, videos, websites, outreach programs, goals to engage every organization and family in this community.  Be ready for what comes back; and keep the focus on action.
  7. (UN: Climate Change Conference - Copenhagen)   Show the local results to prove Santa Cruz County is a world leader. 
  8. (December 1, 2010 - on)  Measure and present the results; keep our community focused and the acting; and always do what is necessary without delay.  Never adjourn with out action.   And, apologies if pedantic, never attempt to fool nature; never.


In a sentence, I am calling upon you, the supervisors and the government of Santa Cruz County to lead, to govern - not merely manage, by demonstrating urgency, openness, unity, political will and utter determination to get CO2 down now and every year following.    Find a way.   There is just no more time.


Thank you.


Thursday, September 24, 2009

Santa Cruz: Rail Cleanup and Art Day - Sunday 27th

A message from Transition Santa Cruz and Rail to Trail:


A friendly reminder that this Sunday, the 27th, is the Rail Cleanup and Art Day. Transition Santa Cruz has organized a mural painting, fun for the whole family, to augment the cleanup activities that will be taking place. Note the new timing: Mural painting at 9:30, cleanup starting at 1 PM.

To do art with your visions of a people's rail corridor, come with painting clothes and paint brushes if you have them. Meet near California and Bay at the entrance to Neary's Lagoon Park.

Remember, this event has been organized both for fun and to encourage the purchase of the rail corridor, one of our best bets for sustainable transportation in Santa Cruz County.

The 1:00 cleanup event will start at two locations:
1. On the east side of the San Lorenzo River Trestle
2. At the Bike Station in Aptos Village
Wear closed toe shoes and gloves.
Please bring garbage bags if you have them, and of course, art supplies!

For more information on the cleanup, contact People Power at 425-0665. For more info on making Art at the event, contact Christi at 459-7950.



Contact Information
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Our Website
phone: 831-427-9916


Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Flrst Flush, watershed montoring, quality at beaches - data

Despite today's heat, my boots, flashlight, rain gear are ready at the door.   I am waiting for a day or night phone call from Coastal Watershed Council that rain is coming and First Flush is on.

 

Our 12 teams are ready; we've been to an orientation and then did a 'dry run' early this past Saturday morning with buckets, PH strips, water collection bottles, ice chests, conductivity meters and boots (well, except me - I forgot.)  

 

With mother nature's cooperation, sometime in October summer will truly end in Santa Cruz and we'll get our first significant rain.  When that happens, day or night, our band of volunteers, supplemented by a Cabrillo group plus numerous veterans, will report to 3 Hubs and disburse into predefined locations  where urban storm water reaches the watershed, that is our creeks, rivers, streams.  Here we'll measure the first water run offs complete with materials that have been collecting all summer on our dry roads, sidewalks, and parking lots.  [Last week's unanticipated downpour was considered a 'late summer rain', though the exact distinction is a little vague to me.]

 

Why measure things like urea, bacteria, heavy metals?   Bottom line:  city runoff is dirty, filled with toxins, elevated bacteria levels, stuff from leaky sewers, metals from our car's break pads.  We don't exactly know how much or what substances.

 

While drinking water is treated, regulated and closely monitored  (and very good in Santa Cruz), and similarly sewage discharge is treated and regulated, there is scant monitoring or regulation of what comes off city streets and sidewalks and flows into the watershed.  That's why you see "No dumping, flows to the Bay" on storm drains.   Our roads and sidewalks are impermeable to water.   So every fall when the first flush comes, everything collecting from summer - things like bacteria from dog poop, copper, magnesium, lead from cars, detergents, pesticides from your garden - flows in one big blast into the storm drains, into the pipes and directly into the watershed.   

 

During First Flush, we'll be waiting at the other end of these storm drain pipes to catch what comes out. With impermeable streets it can't go too many other places. Yuck!

The non-profit Coastal Watershed Council has been monitoring watersheds since 1996.  They work closely with the EPA, state and central coast cities and counties through grants and contracts to provide local technical advice, monitoring, outreach and stewardship programs and maintain a website data portal.    Here's their Google map.  (Click on the map, find your watershed.)


Watershed management is a relatively new field, and complex, since water of course water is all connected.   With only a total staff of 4,  they now offer First Flush, Urban Watch, Snapshot programs.  Debie Chirco-Macdonald and Nancy Scarborough run the First Flush program.

What can we do?  Think about your 'water footprint.'


  • Never pour oils, chemicals, liquids or even dog poop down a storm drain.

    Pick up pet waste


  • Before the first rain (like, soon) sweep your driveway and gutters and compost an organic materials.   (Decaying vegetation affects oxygen levels.)
  • Think about home runoff:  Can you "Slow it?  Sink it?  Spread it?"  Capture rainwater from the roof?
  • Use safer laundry detergents
  • Volunteer or contribute to help our watersheds

As to First Flush, we have a betting pool to pick the date and time of first flush rain.  At this moment I'm still dry, drinking cool tap water.

Remember our water is safe, but it is all connected.   Be a good water steward in your home.



(On the Google Map, find your watershed first)





Monday, September 21, 2009

UN, Commisson on Environment,10x10

77 days to Copenhagen

This is Climate Week.  A few important events this week in Santa Cruz:

Tues - Sept 22 - Barak Obama address UN summit on Climate Change
Tues - Sept 22 - 7 pm Capitola - Commission on the Environment 
Wed - Sept 23 - 5 pm - Santa Cruz County - Commission of Environment

Being a political neophyte, I had a few questions about the County's agenda.   Below is my email to Nancy Gordon of the County.  

If there are things I should be asking, or a better way to ask them, please let me know.   (Like Vietnam and Civil Rights, sometimes we can not wait for government, is 10x10 an answer?)


County of Santa Cruz - Commission on the Environment
Dear Nancy:

A couple of things:

  • August 26 minutes -

    "A member of the public asked for clarification on earlier presentation; Johnson explained public comment process for future meetings."

I also asked about what are the 5 or 10 specific actions on the COE's "hot list" to address the environment and legislation.   Chairman Johnson answered that solar tax district was one and she would have more specifics at September 23 meeting.
  • For this coming meeting, if there are any related documents may I see them in advance, so I can follow the discussion?
  • Committees, Task forces, etc. - Are these open to the public?
  • County "Climate Action Strategy" - sorry, where do I find this document?
  • Not sure where to ask the rest of these:
  • Does County of Santa Cruz report CO2 emissions (Ia4?) Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), CO2 reductions, targets? Also, can this ICLEI info be updated?
  • Copenhagen Climate Change Conference - education and information to Santa Cruz public?
  • UN "Seal the Deal"  - education and information to Santa Cruz public? actions?

  • City of Santa Cruz reported CO2 emissions (note: transportation - 50% of C02, US - 20%) actions?
  • Position on 350 ppm (350.org)?  ( 2C limit,        Jackson Hole   ) - again, public? actions?
  • October 24, 2009 - International Day of Climate Change     - again public? actions?
  • Other important environment actions?   (ex: plastic bags ban?)  But  again  my question is really what actions are are on the Committee's plate?
  • most important - local specific actions, targets and data.

I appreciate your patience with me - I think Climate Change is very serious and action can wait no longer.  For example, the 10x10 movement is to achieve 10% reduction in CO2 emissions by December 31, 2010. 

So Section I has me a bit concerned:  research and topics are excellent, but I want to be sure understand what is research and what is current action to reduce CO2 emissions or improve environment.

==

Friday, September 18, 2009

Books, Climate Change, Municipalies, ICLEI and "The Leftmost City"

What can you read about Climate Change?

An excellent book to start with is The Atlas of Climate Change which is filled with a clear selection of data, charts, maps to illustration the changes occuring now (Greeland's melting ice), science (CO2 rise to historic heights), risks (countries at risk for flooding, storms, etc), Kyoto, how we will have to adapt.  Slightly below Scientic American level and accessible from high school and up.  Very clear survey, very relevant.

If you like more about science of the atmosphere and climate change, consider Climate Change - The point of no return.      

Here is a recent article by same author, Mojib Latif, a well-known climate scientist, discussing problems communicating science.

The WorldWatch Institute produces an annual State of the World,   
a readable, but a bit more advanced collection of articles on numerous topics related to climate change, technology, agricultural practices, specific countries. An article about shifting to growing perennial plants, rather annuals to sequester carbon is intriguing.

If you like case studies and examples of municipal government and communities taking action in the US, Local Action from ICLEI  is very accessible choice, especially for Portland and Fort Collins, Colorado.

If you are not a scientist, but enjoy good writing The Best American Science and Nature Writing has very good collection of the year's best magazine articles, cover the environment [although I liked the one about cooking eggs at a fixed temperature, to bring out flavor of each protein, rather than old fashioned boiling!]

Even a good daily newspaper will have frequent reports of science reports.

And, since this is Santa Cruz, I want to include "The Leftmost City" about local politics.  However, I am deeply concerned that climate warming is too important, albeit too dangerous, to be handled in normal political fashion.

350 ppm and what Santa Cruz can do: 10 x 10

There is growing evidence that even a  2 degree Centigrade warming will have significant consequences for our earth.  While we debate, the amount of atmospheric carbon is increasing yearly by 2%, now over 380 ppm, and will cause us to pass tipping points sooner than we thought. . 

So the logic is that even if we cut CO2 emissions 2%  per year, once thought acceptable (i.e. 80% reduction by 2050) it will be too little, too late. Climate changes occur slowly decades after the cause; we are crossing "tipping points."   Here is some of the science behind 350 ppm.

79 Days to Copenhagen!

The 350 target is new, based on recent science, and growing in support.   The older targets of 80% by 2050 are now considered obsolete by a growing number.

What can Santa Cruz do?  

There is emerging grassroots movement of "10 x 10".   Reduce CO2 by 10% in 1 year (12/31/2010) and then 10% each additional year.  This includes driving 10% fewer miles each year ("vehicle miles traveled", VMT)

Please keep October 24 open, the International Day of Climate Action.  Details later.




Here is more about 350 ppm

Climate Code Red



Here is a UK call for 10 x 10
UK's Call for 10x10 (reduce 10% by 12/31/10)

Jackson Hole,  Wyoming, 10 x 10

Sign the UN petition:
Seal the Deal:

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

81 Days to Copenhagen - "Santa Cruz finds massive changes needed in transportation to meet climate goals."

With 81 days until the Copenhagen Climate Conference begins, the city of San Cruz released its 2008 Green House Gas (GHG)  emissions numbers late last week.  This article, one in a series on Santa Cruz and Copenhagen, reviews some of these numbers.

First, please sign the UN's "Seal the Deal"  so Copenhagen can achieve real action.  Now Santa Cruz's numbers.






(source:   City of Santa Cruz, Ross Clark, 9/11/2009)

These are the same numbers as reported in Sentinel, except for one number: the total reduction of GHG from 1996 is shown here as  -8%, an apparent typo, which the Sentinel corrected to -24%.  


Recall from an earlier post, that the City's goals for reducing GHG emissions are:
30% below 1996 by 2020
80% below 1996 by 2050

So it looks like the city, at -24% for 2008, is well on track.   Perhaps.

First, remember climate change  could be the major challenge of our lifetime.  We are all in this together.   From China to Kenya to France to Santa Cruz. 

The C02 in the atmosphere is about 385 ppm, whereas it was 280 ppm in 1750.  At 385 ppm, if we do nothing, will cause significant climate change, not just warming, in a few decades.  Many scientists insist we much as act immediately and get this number below 350 ppm.   This will buy us time to work on other solutions.  

Back to the Santa Cruz numbers.  The UN (eg Kyoto) and ICLEI, an international group of local governments, have been using 1990 as baseline.   So using a number after 1990 (like 1996 or 2000) makes it easier to "meet" the target because emissions were rising.

Santa Cruz, of course, had an severe earthquake in 1989.   So numbers for the early 1990s are very skewed.  Mr. Clark picked the 1996 as a baseline.   And California's AB32 calls for a baseline of 2000.   We just need to careful.   Santa Cruz had originally been using 1990, like most other US and world municipalities.

But there are at least two other problems with the numbers.  Two categories - Commercial/Industrial and Transportation - are the largest.  Look at the drop in Commercial/Industrial from 1996 to 2000 (77k tons CO2:  168k - 91k).  Unfortunately, Mr. Clark explained it isn't quite so good:  several factories closed in those years and he believes this accounted for most of the 77k drop.

Next look at transportation.  As Paul Schoellhamer of Watsonville points out in  letter to the editor, transportation when from 34% to 51% of our total GHG emissions, where as the national average for transportation is 32%.  So I have borrowed his headline.


In future article, we will look at ICLEI, the organization, and try to examine how GHG emissions are calculated, verified and what Santa Cruz can do to reduce emissions even further.  After all, a real leader must do his or her part and then some.



Monday, September 14, 2009

First Flush

While on the subject of water today, Coastal Watershed is still seeking volunteers to monitor the water and pollution flowing into Monterey Bay from storm drains.  (Despite last night's rain).

Free training and great way to learn how about water and our watershed.

Desal plant

As many of us know, Santa Cruz is planning to build a water desalination plant to serve two purposes:
  • aid the Santa Cruz Water District in periods of severe drought (i.e. 'insurance')
  • otherwise be used by the Soquel Water District to reduce ground water use, which is a very unsustainable practice
It is an understatement to say the issue is complicated; as is everything with water in California.  Just some of the issues:
  • water conservation vs. increasing supplies
  • cost of desal
  • environmental impact of such a plant
  • energy to power desal, including fossil fuel
  • use of the desal water
The last one, use of the desal water, some  2.5 million gals a day, is at least as complicated as the other issues combined.   Why is one of Soquel Water District's acquifiers being depleted?   Is desal the answer?

This is the first of a series of occasional posts on the proposed desalination plant in Santa Cruz.  It is important that all citizens understand the issues, costs, options and uses:   to make an informed decision.

First, attend the officially sponsored Update on September 24. Here are few FAQs, from the Santa Cruz Water District.  And Pro argument published in Santa Cruz Weekly

There is also con.   Some question for the need such plant, some are concerned with its use of fossil fuel and environmental impact.  Others question the very use of the water.  Rick Longinotti prepared slides, available here.   Douglas Deitch wrote an opposition letter  in the Santa Cruz Weekly.

Most complicated of all is the situation in Pajaro Valley, where water is so crucial (podcast) to one of major industries in Santa Cruz County:  strawberries. (note: Gary Patton was supervisor in Santa Cruz County. )  Can Pajaro Valley, strawberries and agriculture be excluded from the desal discussion?

Friday, September 11, 2009

"Seal the Deal" - 86 days to Copenhagen Climate Conference

Copenhagen Climate Conference

Formally known as COP15, the Copenhagen Conference (December 7-18, 2009) must unite the world on emissions reduction post-2012.

Arguably, this will be one of the most important world conferences ever to be held. But, no deal is guaranteed.

Something can and must be done at every level.

For us, as individuals, please sign the UN petition "Seal the Deal"

It's quick and the UN won't spam you.

Next, check on your local government. Santa Cruz (city and country) are members of ICLEI (Local Governments for Sustainability).

In preparation for Copenhagen ICLEI has world-wide City Climate Catalog (background info)

Here is Entire city catalog (your city listed?)
More information about California.

More about Santa Cruz, more about Santa Cruz County

Thanks to Ross Clark, city of Santa Cruz Climate Coordinator, who the also provided information below.
==

Santa Cruz (City of Santa Cruz) California, USA City

Inhabitants (2000): 54.593 Territory size: 40 km2

Baseline year used: 1996

Targets: Water savings target: 282 million gallons per year by 2010 (community)

30% reduction below 1996 by 2020
80% reduction below 1996 by 2050
All new buildings zero net energy by 2030

Steps implemented:

Conducted a GHG emissions inventory Yes (1996, 2000,2005,2008)
Adopted an emissions reduction target(s) Yes
Developed a Local Action Plan In progress
Implemented policies and measures In progress (many implemented)
Monitored and verified results Monitoring in progress.


Community wide results to date:

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Staff of Life & Parking, Smoking Ban

Staff of Life & Parking
===

The same is true of New Leaf (westside), the new Safeway (westside) and now Staff of Life (east side):  building more parking.  (The 2 new Whole Foods  used strip malls, already with too much parking.)

One of the recommendations from Santa Cruz Master Transportation Study (2003?) was to reduce parking on new development, from current 3.3 spaces (per 1000 sq ft of retail) to 2.75 spaces.   According to recent Sentinel article, the new Staff of Life will have 150 spaces (21,000 sq ft), which is 7 spaces per 1000 sq ft.  Moreover the Staff of Life is on several bus lines.

Not trying to pick on Staff of Life, a local store known for good service and reasonable wise policies (although they did do away with the excellent and slightly eccentric vegetarian restaurant in about 2000).

Safeway boasts its new westside location has adequate public transportation:  did anyone check?   And, I couldn't even find the entrance to the westside New Leaf because all  the entrances are in the parking lot.  I showed up at intersection on foot - no entrance.

But where is the City leadership?  Where is the will to emphasis alternative transportation over the automobile?  Friendly communities over sprawl?  To follow the recommendations the City paid half a million for?


Santa Cruz Bans Smoking
===

What took so long?  After all, the American Lung Association gave us a rating of 'D'.
And if the issue is really health why not ban smoking in all interior places?

To those who live here, we know the probably reason is related to situation on Pacific Street, where there is abundant pan-handling, perhaps some drugs and an increasing uncomfortable situation for many.

Like all the other ordinances to combat this, let see how the smoking ban is enforced.


Full article in Sentinel:
Staff of Life

Smoking Ban

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Metro applies for $71 MM in grants

Very pleased to read that Santa Cruz Metro District is applying for $71 million in stimulus funds, since the state has made severe cuts to transit funding.

If awarded, the District will use the money for new CNG buses and new bus storage area.   Of particular interest is the use of solar panels on canopy of storage area, which should reduce commercial electricity by 65% over expected 20-year lifetime; and rainwater collection system, which should reduce use of city's water by 80%.

Grant proposal is due by September 15 and US Department of Transportation TIGER awards will be made in November.

Full article in San Jose Business Journal.

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

"Rewrite, not renew Childhood Nutrition Act" - Farr at "Eat-in"

Addressing a very friendly Labor Day "eat-in" in San Lorenzo Park, Rep Sam Farr (D-Carmel) and Assembly Bill Monning (D-27)  spoke forcefully about the need to provide healthy, local food and teach children good nutrition habits.

The "eat-in" drew more than 100, many teachers, students, parents, members of advocacy groups as well as local politicians.   The sponsors were the Santa Cruz Education Foundation and Slow Food Santa Cruz.

The current Childhood Nutrition Act, up for renewal in Congress, is the basis for federally subsidized school hot lunch program for eligible students, which includes just under 48% of  Santa Cruz County students. (Other students may purchase these meals.)   However, the program only provides $2.57 per student per meal to cover costs, including salaries and administration, leaving about $1 for actual food.  Advocates are calling for another $1 be added to the federal program, at a cost of an extra $5 billion nationwide.

Compared to the annual federal cost for diabetes of $120 billion, Michelle Obama has argued $5 billion for children is a bargain.

At the event, Farr explained the federal law was an attempt to serve two audiences, low-income children and the agricultural industry who need to dispose of excess commodities (sugar, peanuts, wheat, corn, milk, etc.).  This has led to a few puzzles.  For example, milk and dairy are considered two separate programs to appeal to the dairy industry.    Since most school districts can not handle a freight car full of wheat,  all foods are sent to food processors who deliver the highly processed foods to schools.

Farr called for simplified system, with more local control, more local food and an expansion of the program to cover employees working "in jails and on the fire lines."  He called for a "salad bar in every school" and vowed to "Rewrite, not renew the Childhood Nutrition Act" upon return to Washington.

Monning spoke of the people who harvest our foods and  that even on Labor Day many agricultural workers do not have the day off.   He stressed the need for nutrition education, the crisis in Pajaro Valley schools and that forecasts show "almost 1 out of 3 Hispanic adults will develop diabetes."  He urged more farm-to-school programs and more science fair projects involving agriculture.

Santa Cruz Mayor Mathews also spoke and several local politicians were announced.

Before the event, one parent said, "It's all about convenience and we are a packaged food nation."  Another said, "Part of the problem is, unfortunately, many parents do not know healthy choices, but we can not preach."

[Other undiscussed alternatives might be: tightening nutrition labeling laws, restricting or banning advertising or sales of unhealthy food to minors, as we have done with tobaaco.]

We need to follow Farr's legislation in Washington.

More on the Labor Day Event:  SJ Mercury



Background:


Santa Cruz Weekly  (food nutrition in Santa Cruz schools)

Child Nutrition Law (New York Times
 (background on legislation and proposals)

Recommendations (Center for Science in the Public Interest)
"Good nutrition should begin in childhood when eating habits are formed and chronic diseases begin to develop.  Yet over the last two decades, rates of obesity have tripled in  children and adolescents.  Only 2% of children eat a healthy diet ...

Prior Green Watch blog post

Sunday, September 6, 2009

Santa Cruz - Solar compactor; Land Use meeting

Solar Compactor

Do you use the Solar Compactor (also known as BigBelly TM ?)  There are a couple in downtown Santa Cruz and Capitola and one at UCSC.

What's a Solar Compactor?   It is a self-contained trash barrel that also uses solar power to compact the trash contents when the weight reaches a pre-set number.  (UCSC has it sent at 70 pounds.)    The idea is to reduce frequency and labor needed to cart away trash, especially useful in busy areas.

One unit is near the Del Mar Theater; it has no special label, except  "Pitch In."   The solar panel is on the back, under a tree with no problem, but on a Sunday morning I found the the front trash bin full of trash, with red light flashing (meaning time for compacting).

A nearby downtown merchant said the nearby unit worked very, very well, but added it has been a target of vandalism.

UCSC has one, near the Bay Tree Bookstore.   It compacts when the total weight is 70 pounds.  UCSC paid for its unit, about $3-4k, with grants, and has had few maintenance problems.  

Background:
==
Land Use and Transportation

When it comes to sustainability, the two - Land Use and Transportation - are very closely tied together.

Rick Longinotti  has organized a working group through Transition Santa Cruz to study the issues related to land use, transportation, affordable housing and to study current legislation or initiate new legislation that will improve the sustainability of our neighborhoods.

Here are the details:

Sept 9 Agenda
http://www.scribd.com/doc/19473653/Agenda-Sept-9-Land-Use-Transportation-Transition-Santa-Cruz

Transition Santa Cruz
http://transitionsc.org/

Friday, September 4, 2009

Plastic Bag Ban - Applaud Santa Cruz Sentinel's Editorial, Santa Cruz Weekly

Recycling does not work.

Applaud the Sentinel's clear support of a plastic bag ban for Santa Cruz, even if it invites industry ligitation.  Enacting this would be an opportunity for Santa Cruz to demonstrate its commitment to doing the right thing.

Santa Cruz Weekly is also voicing concern, and in this about Oceans meeting.

Considering banning plastic bottled water, too.   Santa Cruz water is excellent and like all tap water, heavily regulated to insure safety.

Why?
Read the report from Project Kaisei on the Great Pacific Garbage Patch in SJ Mercury News.

Full Sentinel editorial

Banning Plastic:
http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/19/plastic-bag-wars-poised-to-continue/
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0721-04.htm

Thursday, September 3, 2009

City of Santa Cruz - Water Department

With 90-degree temperatures and a Stage 2 water shortage, water is very much on our minds.  At the the last City Water Commission meeting (August 24, 2009), two presentations were particularly important:

Toby Goddard, the city's Water Conservation Manager, presented a status report.   Here are some of the highlights (his full report: Status Report on 2009 Water Restrictions)

  • About 1/2 of our water comes from the San Lorenzo River.   However, this year the daily flow is substantially below the 72-year average flow (about 1/3 below).
  • The city's goal for May-October water usage is a 15% reduction.
  • Several large customers have reduced their water usage more than 15%.  (thanks)
  • In May and June daily water demand reduced by 15% (great!), but since July use has started to rise and  we must be  careful.
  • Overall, Mr. Goddard is pleased with the results to-date.   Unlike previous shortages, water users are recognizing the need to improve watering and irrigation systems, reduce flow in shower heads and change some wasteful behavior.
  • Mr. Goddard attributes the conservation to public cooperation and greater awareness.  His department is eager to work with consumers, educate and assist with problems.
Terry Tompkins, a chemist and Deputy Director/Operations Manager of Graham Hill Road Treatment Plant, spoke on water quality and the disinfection process.   This is much more complicated then adding a bit of chlorine to the water; it a remarkably complicated chemical and biological system, subject to changing federal regulations and priorities and, of course, changing water and biological conditions.   It is a delicate system to keep in balance.

Our water system is  really a patch work of 6 water systems, with only 1 treatment plant to treat the water before we drink it.   In other words, Graham Hill can't go offline for more than a few hours.   Fortunately, most of us can take this for granted.  Mr. Tompkins does not.

Mr. Tompkins spoke of potential problem with by-products of the disinfection process.   Today, we are fine, well within federal safety margins.  But he is thinking ahead.

Modern water filtration systems use membrane technologies, which are relatively new and still quite expensive.   There are alternatives, one process requires flushing the system of 50 million gallons of water, not a popular choice in a water shortage.  At this meeting, Mr. Tompkins was alerting the Commission to the possible need to purchase such a membrane, at an estimated cost of $40-$50 million. [Update 9/8/09 - the Water Department is currently re-examining lower cost solutions with comparable water quality without using expensive membrane technology.]

SAVE WATER.   It really is precious.



City of Santa Cruz Water Department
http://www.ci.santa-cruz.ca.us/wt/

City of Santa Cruz Water Department - Conservation
http://www.ci.santa-cruz.ca.us/wt/conservation/index.html

City of Santa Cruz Water Department - Water Shortage Contingency Plan

http://www.ci.santa-cruz.ca.us/wt/conservation/pdf/WaterShortageContingencyPlan.pdf

City of Santa Cruz - Water Commission - August 24, 2009 Report (.pdf)
http://www.scribd.com/share/upload/15245392/wobopgqufcskjw0untf


Sentinel Article on  Water
http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/rss/ci_13200783?source=rss

Graywater in Santa Cruz

Probably few people can deliver a perky introduction to the subject of graywater and residential codes, but Sherry Lee Byran pulled it off last night at Ecology Action's September Green Drinks.

Officially, Ms. Bryan is Senior Program Specialist, Pollution Prevention/Zero Waste Group at Ecology Action.   Last night she explained that, with a 3rd year of drought and a snow pack 39% below normal this past spring, California had the impetus to revise and approve a graywater residential code in just 6 months and put it into effect August 4.  (It may be revised.)

What does this mean for us?  A more sustainable and efficient way to water our gardens and foilage.

Graywater, by California's legal definition, explained Bryan is everything but blackwater (toilet) and not dishwater water, i.e. laundry, bathroom sink, showers are all fine.   (Dishwater is barred because it can contain fats and animal products. )

For single source applications (i.e only laudry or only shower water ), residences may use graywater for plants by labeling the line and being sure it enters the ground 100 feet from the house (avoid backflow) and 2 inches deep .   That's just about it:  No Permit required!  Bryan stressed, in her entertaining way, not to use boron soaps, no salts, no bleach (toxic to plants), or bloody shirts and keep the water away from root crops like carrots.  The law requires that graywater and storm water never mix.

For irrigation, drip-irrigation or more complex systems, Bryan encouraged using a professional and that a permit is required.  (Currently the County is deciding how to award permits:  start with Environmental Health)

The code is here.

And before anyone time to reach for another beer  (or nod off), she finished.   Good job and good job for California for taking an important step toward efficiency and sustainability.  But now it is up to us.


More Links:
Sherry Lee Bryan


Graywater Research & Advocacy
http://www.greywateralliance.org

Green Drinks
www.greendrinks.org


Graywater Research & Advocacy
http://www.greywateralliance.org

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Freedom Lake - Problem or Challenge?

Freedom Lake is choking with an invasive plant, water hyacinth, writes Supervisor Ellen Pirie (Mid County Post, August 28).   Called Corralitos Lagoon by Google, here's what it looks like! (Zoom in, shift to left)


View Larger Map

Supervisor Pirie details the 5-year efforts, and frustrations, to obtain the funding  or grants for the clean-up.  But short of funds, the County staff has worked hard to investigate several  lower cost alternatives, which unfortunately are not suitable either,  as Pirie explains clearly.

She concludes:

"In summary, there are no quick, simple or cheap solutions to the water hyacinth problem at Freedom Lake.

The successful, long-term restoration of Freedom Lake will take several years, the combined effort of multiple agencies, and a lot of money."

==
I am not a biologist and have never even seen the lake.   So ask this in the spirit of cooperation, not any kind of criticism, and for purpose of discussion and an illustration: 

Could one get in a boat and pull out some of the invasive plants?


What I am trying to suggest, again in a gingerly fashion, is that sometimes in this country there is a bias toward using equipment, technologies, consultants, even courts, i.e. capital expensive "solutions" to solve problems.  I have lived in a country which can get things done very quickly with little very limited capital.

If not this project, surely the Santa Cruz has 10 others than might be solved by pooling the creative talents of our citizens and communities to explore more possible solutions, albeit possibly resulting in a more labor-intensive solution.


Could Cabrillo/UCSC students take a closer look, with a faculty member?  Could we train several agricultural workers to manage the Lake (green jobs)?  Could a school adopt the Lake on an ongoing basis, with the understanding that the County should reimburse the school in another way.

With a name like Freedom Lake and all of 25 acres, we must take this challenge and succeed.

Here is the full article: 

Historical Background
http://www.corralitoshistory.com/five_mile.html

Sierra Group interest:
http://ventana.sierraclub.org/conservation/local/freedomLake.shtml

Redwoods, Gasoline Powered Bicycles in Santa Cruz

Today at UCSC the long planned and litigated felling of several redwoods began, to make way for a new building.

Even a non-treehugger can not avoid feeling some silent emotion to see a majestic tree humbled by man.  We sang about redwood forests in Kindergarden, in a simpler, more optimistism era.  But it would take 40 more years before I actually saw one, and even longer to come to appreciate the the tree, the land, the mist and the climate and a special relationship among them all.

==
There seem to be a growing number of bicycles outfilled with gasoline-powered engines in Santa Cruz.   Half bicycle, half motorized vehicle and 100% noise and pollution - can Santa Cruz ban these things pronto?  They don't belong here or anywhere.

Bloggers on Local Government Environmental Policies

For bloggers who follow their local governments environmental policies and actions, I would like to know:

  • How do you work with local government, staff, commissions as well as local non-profits, newspapers, etc?  How do you get information?
  • What do you find the right distance to be, so neither too cozy nor too abrasive?
  • How do you view your mission?   Are you reporter, critic, activist, publicist,watchdog?
  • Who is your primary audience?  Local government, local population, environments?
Is there such a thing as "strike team", an informal, national/international, multi-disciplinary team who can take a quick look at given proposed local strategies or initatives and just compare these to successes/failures in similar communities elswhere?   We don't want to keep re-inventing the wheel.   The "team" might be biologists, renewable energy engineers, industrial ecologists, environmentals, etc.